Friday, October 15, 2010

Losing My Innocents



Of course I knew it would happen.  I have three boys.  I’m not in denial.  I just kept thinking, “They’re so young. Does it have to happen so early?”

First, it was my oldest son up in his room.  Alone.

The other day, I was cleaning out my middle son’s backpack.  There it was at the bottom of his school bag.

Then, the postal service delivered a thick envelope for my husband.  It didn’t actually say what was inside, but I knew.

One by one, I’m losing the boys in my house to J.R.R. Tolkien and The Lord of The Rings.  It started with the paperbacks from our own shelves, then the audio books, extra copies checked out from the library, and now Netflix DVDs of the Peter Jackson masterpieces.  I thought the tales might be a passing fad in our house, but their pull and power seem to get stronger.

Back in college when I moved to China for a semester, my now husband told me he wanted to give me a gift to remember him by while I was halfway around the world.  He then presented me with The Lord of The Rings trilogy in paperback – plus the prequel, The Hobbit, to get me started.  That should have been my first hint to the whole Mars and Venus debate.

But, I hadn’t read the stories and was eager to find clues to the deeper meaning of our relationship that were surely written within.  I read away – all 1,646 pages (excluding appendices).  And no clues emerged from the depths.  Just Gollum and Smaug and other man-beast-amphibian type creatures. 

The books did eventually unlock one mystery for me. Like, why I had so many male suitors to my Chinese dorm room.  We’d have tea, make vocabulary flash cards, and practice our Mandarin accents.  Eventually, every time, they’d find the way around to asking, “Can I borrow your Return of The King?”

Yes, all those adventurous American college boys halfway around the world wanted a little piece of The Fellowship.  They and more than 150 million other readers – making it the second best-selling book of all time, just behind Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities.

As if the written words weren’t enough, New Zealand director Sir Peter Jackson renewed and deepened the spell cast over men and boys by Lord of The Rings – or LOTR to its fans – with his big-screen version of the trilogy released in 2001, 2002 and 2003.

Slim and I walked out of the first installment together, both nearly speechless.  He finally mustered the words to say something akin to, “I think that was the best movie I’ve ever seen.”  I was still trying to wake myself from a 2 hour 18 minute stupor of incomparable boredom.

The husband of a friend uses his VHS (!) tape of the movie to lull himself to sleep at night -- like the soothing lullaby of a trusted storyteller.  His trusted, soothing wife waits about five minutes and then turns it off.

Sir Peter and his shire-mates are hard at work on the two-part film of The Hobbit.  The movie’s production is rumored to be the most expensive of all time.  And that was before this month’s fire ripped through Jackson’s studio of miniatures used to create scenes and special effects for the films.  Mind you those are miniatures, not Gandalf and Frodo dolls.

Yes, I get it.  Boys love fantasy and a good adventure story.  But why these more than any others?  And why do they still appeal almost exclusively to male readers, when girls have been borrowing from the fantasy bookshelf for years?

The answer is apparently the only simple thing about Tolkien’s complex world.

“Basically, it’s a men’s club.  A very interesting one, but a men’s club,” says Anita Silvey, the premier authority on books for children and young adults.  “Children always like to see themselves reflected in a book – there has to be a role for them to play.  This is a cast of all male characters, with women playing only very minor roles.”

It shouldn’t surprise you that there are all kinds of websites with games, wikis, role-playing, and quizzes dedicated to the lore of LOTR.  In the “Which Lord of The Rings Girl R U?” quiz, I landed Galadriel.  I don’t care if Tolkien did consider her “the greatest of elven women.”  If she doesn’t end up with Viggo Mortensen, I’m not interested.

Silvey says that Tolkien’s mastery of the genre and the English language has also bolstered his tales’ endurance.  “He set the highest standard of fantasy for anyone in the twentieth century.  So it’s no surprise that readers who don’t normally want a fantasy world are perfectly happy to live in that fantasy world.”

Which explains why Thing One, who has no patience for the fantastical and make-believe, will gladly trade the action of a game of men fighting for the ball on one channel for the tale of men fighting for a ring on another.

Completing The Lord of The Rings series is no small feat for any reader. But for a child or a maturing reader, the accomplishment can be a milestone.  “A child who finishes Tolkien knows that all of literature is open to them,” says Silvey.  “It is one of those books that changes the way you look at the world.  And those are very rare.”

That sentiment has me warming to the fact that Thing Two has taken to the books after resisting the series for years.  “In reading, you are looking for the right book, for the right child, at the right time.”  Silvey says that many readers attempt the series a number of times before they are ready.  “And then one day, you think I am really ready to go on this journey with them.  And with The Lord of The Rings you’ve got to be prepared to go all the way to the end.”

And that explains why a friend of mine calls The Hobbit a gateway drug.

Mr. Tolkien ends the first book – which, like so much of fine literature, began as a bedtime story for his children – with a blend of inspiration and reassurance to which most parents can only aspire. “You are a very fine person, Mr. Baggins, and I am very fond of you; but you are only quite a little fellow in a wide world after all!”

As a mother of three little fellows in the wide world only too eager to be part of an epic journey to Middle Earth, I am considering adding the book to the stack on my night table. 

“I envy anyone who can read it for the first time,” says Silvey.

Then again, maybe I’ll just read Jane Eyre for the fourth time.


20 comments:

  1. First, I will bet you $100 that one of the male readers of this post will correct your fourth paragraph from the bottom, admonishing you that it is, at least, "Doctor Tolkien," and that they'd actually prefer "Professor Tolkien." You know, so it sounds like they're reading serious academic prose.

    Second, don't read Jane Eyre again; if you're going to go there, go ALL THE WAY there. Read Tenant of Wildfell Hall and Agnes Grey so you get full credit as a Reader of Women's Literature by boning up on the least-known of the Bronte sisters. Looks more like scholarship and less like an attempt to stave off the miasma of testosterone you live with.

    And I'll get that copy of The Hobbit with the illustrations from the 1970s animated special (thank you, Hanna-Barbera) over to you asap. Just in case you change your mind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree with you a bit on the gendered aspect of the LOTR; I read this series 10 times as a young girl. It is not the necessarily the subject matter but the level of detail that makes it so interesting for those who love books. There's so much to remember and so much back story that the series holds up to numerous reads. In this sense, LOTR is a LOT like the Harry Potter series, although set in a more tweedy and more "dire" setting. So don't write off the girls in this discussion. BTW, I also read Jane Eyre about times. My daughter, an ardent reader, likes neither Jane Eyre nor LOTRs. I'm not sure gender is the defining factor here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hate to repeat a quote I can't attribute, but it seems to appropriate:

    "There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old boy's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry Molly, I have to say that I loved the Lord of the Rings films. Then again, I also religiously watched the Stars Wars trilogy every year in college - much to my roommate's dismay. "How many more hours are you going to sit on that couch and why aren't you doing your homework?!" she would moan.). When I really look back, though, I'm not convinced I would have loved the Lord of The Rings as much if not for Viggo and Orlando . . .

    ReplyDelete
  5. Look, I did read it as a boy of 6, but I do know a number of women who like it far more than I do. One, hardly a geek fangirl, got married wearing Galadriel's crown and watches it once a week when she can. And she's a Puerto Rican American graphic designer who spends the time away from her job and kids knitting.

    Now Atlas Shrugged I could never get more than 3 pages into ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm all there with you. Never could read the books and thankfully avoided the movies. Some things are better left to the guys. And that's a comment I rarely make. I'm sending you Emma and Clueless, Queen Bees and Wanna Bees and other chick stuff to keep you sane.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I started with The Hobbit and eagerly devoured the LOTR trilogy in middle school and high school, and never really considered it biased towards any gender. I did try very hard to read other Tolkien works, found all of it impenetrable, and went back for another LOTR fix. Thank goodness the movies were so well done - I was mesmermized (and not only by Viggo/Orlando)through all three. Sadly, I can't get any of my three children (two girls and a boy, youngest 13) into the series, although I push The Hobbit on the 13-year-old at every opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm going to call BS on this post. I know for a fact that 'Fletch' is the greatest movie Slim ever saw. Heard him say it myself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Molly, I am with you. I think that you would like a movie called '300' though. It is a mother daughter movie. The daughter has cancer and has 300 days to live. It is set in ancient greece. I think that you would really love it!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I also loved The Hobbit and the trilogy. I didn't read them until after I had my first child, and they were a welcome escape into excellent writing and a world so vividly detailed in its description. I had devoured The Chronicles of Narnia as a child, and when I picked up LOTR, I felt that same rush. It did not matter to me the number of female characters. The imagination and gift of writing it must have taken to create such a work is nothing short of genius. Few contemporary authors could compare. JK Rowling is probably as close as anyone could come.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Molly, so funny, I was thinking you were going to say a different thing "with 3 boys" and hidden backpacks and thick envelope - needless to say thought it was a something a little less wholesome. Anyway, I just confirmed with Bill - because I never heard him mention those books and neither of us have ever read it!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree it's not necessarily a gender thing. I was mesmerized by the Hobbit and LOTR as a preteen. In fact I was introduced to the books by an older sister. The fascination stemmed more from a desire for magic and meaning in an otherwise pretty homogenous landscape growing up in western Kentucky than identification with the characters per se. My family owned the only hilled woods in the county and I would escape there for hours imaging it unfold below my private perch. Needless to say my Tolkien tending sister and I were not the typical KY teenage girls, but we certainly had a rich, imaginative childhood. My sister, now an accomplished artist in the flatlands of Indiana, is still a bit of an elf. She was recently featured in the Indianapolis Star for her organization of works in the Stutz Gallery called "Voices: Women of a Certain Age." In the article she is sporting a tiara of birch leaves she crafted out of bronze -- if that isn't a Tolkien inspired piece I don't know what is! You can find more of her Tolkien-like work on her website at leighdunnington-jones.com or you could email her at her appropriately dubbed address: theprincessleigh@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. yeeks! you can't possibly be saying that a girl can't identify with classic literature or fine films unless the lead character is female! football maybe tho.....

    ReplyDelete
  14. Molly, I don't comment because I don't quite get how to do it; what's my profile, too many options. However, here I try. As always, you make me laugh as you present your argument. I agree with all you say about LOR, but disagree about the gender thing. My three girls have enjoyed the stories in many forms. In 2002, the stories helped my children enjoy the landscape of New Zealand. That same xmas the movies became part of our holiday tradition, along with watching It's a Wonderful life. At age six, my thing 2 declared her next birthday party would be an outing to see the not yet released Return of the King. To this day, my thing 3's likes to curl up with dad and fall asleep watching the Fellowship. We have listened to the stories in the car more than once on our trips to VT and we own all three extended DVD collections. And I, female to the core, will admit I have watched every moment of the bonus features of each!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Molly - Glad you read them and if Slim and the Things like the genre, there are many other stories with elves, goblins, Ogres swords and wizards enough to keep them occupied and out of trouble. And yes your friends and blog readers may comment, but only when asked.

    ReplyDelete
  16. All right, all right, point taken. Apparently a lot more of my friends than I expected were in their dorm rooms with Tolkien when they should have been in class.

    And, wow, a Lord of The Rings themed wedding.

    Randolph, thanks for the Atlas Shrugged bit - nice.

    To Murray, Pat, Tripp and T.J. -- why do keep calling yourself anonymous? Yes, Fletch is a GREAT movie. Thank God... the police.

    Thanks for the feedback. I'm still standing my ground.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Molly- And all this time I thought it was just me! Double up that sentiment for the movie (is it over yet?!) I suppose to be fair I should give it to the boys and see what happens. I do agree with Randolph about Atlas Shrugged. I'd also add A Prayer for Owen Meany.
    Mary

    ReplyDelete
  18. I had to re-post once I read these comments!
    1. Whichever "Anon" it was that posted about the Galadriel crown is sorely mistaken regarding said elf-bride's status: that is perhaps well BEYOND the definition of geek fangirl, sorry.
    2. Did you notice that the people who had read the books referred to them as LOTR in their posts? (While I stopped after The Hobbit, I do know what the acronym stands for.) I just think it's interesting that those who have a passing knowledge are happier to refer to the books as "Tolkien," e.g., "I read Tolkien as a youngster," versus "we watched LOTR when she was 6." Hm.
    3. I think your sample is more than a little skewed, don't you? ;)
    4. I admit to watching all the movies, but only because Orlando Bloom is HOT. Seriously so.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I too am a spouse who came late to LOTR. My boys aren't old enough yet but my husband is a dyed in the wool fan so I started by trying to understand him and then decided the movies were amazing. Set in New Zealand, even dwarves and elves seem pretty cool. The books, not so much

    ReplyDelete
  20. Ha! This post cracked me up.

    I jumped over here from blogher, and I *LOVE* your blog title/subtitle. I'm a follower now!

    ReplyDelete